Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 20, 1895PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee District Court. — Hon. A. Van Wagenen, Judge. . Action at law to recover for work and labor, for slanderous utterances used by defendant of and concerning the plaintiff, and for alienating the affections of her husband. Trial to a jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for the alleged slander and alienation of her husband’s affections. Defendant appeals. — ■

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Plaintiff herein brought suit against the defendant, who is her father-in-law, upon six causes of action, one of which was for work and labor performed, and the other five for slander. Afterward she amended her petition by adding another count for alienating her husband’s affections. The defense was a general denial, and a plea of the statute of limitations to the count for alienation of affections. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict for plaintiff for two thousand dollars, — eight hundred dollars for slander, and one thousand two hundred dollars for alienating her husband’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kniffen v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Bennett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Hinkle v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  5. Prime v. EastwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hall v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Henderson v. DreyfusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sexton v. SextonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Colbert v. Journal Publishing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Glatstein v. GrundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API