Legal Opinion

People v. Chaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he did not effectively waive his right to a jury trial (see, People v Cotton, 167 AD2d 884, lv dismissed 77 NY2d 904, cert denied 513 US 1093; People v Logue, 115 AD2d 285, lv denied 67 NY2d 886). Defense counsel’s concession of defendant’s guilt of the second and third counts of the indictment was part of a reasonable trial strategy and did not deny defendant meaningful representation (see, People v Ellis, 81 NY2d 854, 856-857; People v Goss, 229 AD2d 791, 793). Nor was defense counsel’s concession…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. GossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. NevinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. BonillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. HollenquestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. PilatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API