State v. McDay
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ARGUMENT
1. Appellant cannot get employment in his educational field due to the fact he cannot pass a BCI/ FBI background check.
2. Appellant is continually today profiled based on inaccurate data on record and affects passage between US and Canadian borders as an example.
3. The basis of BCI's denial to update is "based on the record". Given that statement, there is no reason to deny revision in order to match the existing Idaho Repository.
Based on McDay's briefing, we will not reach the merits of his claims on appeal. While his ultimate goal is clear-he wants to have the two criminal cases…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Jorgensen v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Inama v. Boise County Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. ByrumIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- Burnside v. NW Trustee SvcIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
- Byerly v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- Dorr v. IDOLIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.