Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eubanks v. Tucker

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 27, 1944No. 232Published

1ConcurrenceKennerly, District Judge

Plaintiffs pray that defendants be enjoined and restrained:(a) From arresting and prosecuting them in the Courts of Texas for having in their possession, etc., fish of a size, etc. violative of the Texas Statutes.(b) From seizing, etc., such fish.

1. On the question of enjoining Plaintiffs’ arrest and prosecution under the Texas statutes, I see no difference in principle between this case and the cases of Douglass v. Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 159, 63 S.Ct. 877, 882, 87 L.Ed. 1324, and Lee v. City of El Campo, 5 Cir., 135 F.2d 740; Id., D. C., 50 F.Supp. 411, and think plaintiffs’ bill to enjoin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Whittington v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1936
  4. Thompson v. SpearCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  5. Lee v. City of El CampoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API