Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 25, 2007No. 14-06-00632-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice.

Appellant, Jeremy Wayne Baldwin, was charged by indictment with possession of cocaine. The indictment also contained two enhancement paragraphs. Prior to trial, appellant filed a motion to suppress which, after a hearing, was denied by the trial court. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant then entered a plea of guilty to the offense of possession and a plea of true to the enhancement allegations. In compliance with the plea bargain agreement, the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Baldwin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. Baldwin, Jeremy WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API