Legal Opinion

State v. Workman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1911No. 9735PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered May 6, 1911, upon a trial and conviction of rape.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict convicting the appellant of the crime of statutory rape.

The refusal of the court to direct a verdict of acquittal upon appellant’s motion after the state had rested is the first assignment of error. It is claimed that, because the prosecuting witness testified that she had “intercourse” with the appellant, that this was not sufficient to prove sexual intercourse. One authority, People v. Howard, 143 Cal. 316, 76 Pac. 1116, so holding is cited, but we are not inclined to follow so technical a rule. It is plain from the whole of her testimony that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CoellaWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State v. SargentWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. JonasWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. Ortega-MartinezWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. CraneWashington Supreme Court · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API