Legal Opinion

General Foods Corp. v. Priddle

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 9, 1983No. 82-4111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROGERS, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, General Foods Corporation, to enjoin the defendants, Harland E. Priddle, Secretary of the Kansas State Board of Agriculture, Brace Rowley, Dairy Commissioner of the State of Kansas, and the Kansas State Board of Agriculture, from prohibiting the sale of their frozen whipped toppings with dairy ingredients within the State of Kansas under the provisions of the Kansas filled dairy products act (FDPA), K.S.A. 65-725 et seq. This opinion represents the findings of fact and conclusions of law in this case in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fields v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  2. Committee for Accurate Labeling & Marketing v. BrownbackDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1995
  4. COMMITTEE FOR ACCURATE L. & MARKETING v. BrownbackDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API