Legal Opinion

State v. Young.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

INDICTMENT against Paul W. Young, heard by Judge Fred Moore and a jury, at the September Term, 1904 of the Superior Court of New Hanovee, County. Erom a verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The defendant convicted of assault and battery, assigns as error:(1) That the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence. This was a matter for the judge below and is not reviewable. McCord v. Railroad, 134 N. C., 59; State v. Kiger, 115 N. C., 751.(2) That the State was improperly permitted to challenge one E. H. Freeman, talis juror, upon the ground that he was not a freeholder. The clerk of the Superior Court had issued to him a license under The Code, 3390-3392, Laws 1893, ch. 287, sec. 2, to lay off an oyster and clam bed in the waters of the State. This was not an interest in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hess v. MuirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. State v. . KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Myers v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rohrer v. CredleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Hunter v. Associated Mortgage Companies Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. State v. . HaynieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API