Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Associated Mortgage Companies Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 24, 1936No. 11317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The superior courFof DeKalb County was without jurisdiction to confirm or refuse to confirm the sale of the property. . The entire act of 1935 was unconstitutional and void as against the enforcement of this contract, which was executed before the approval of the act. Atlantic Loan Co. v. Peterson, 181 Ga. 266 (182 S. E. 15). The question of constitutionality of the act was not raised in DeKalb superior court in the proceeding now being considered. On the contrary the creditor undertook to comply with its terms, and prayed for confirmation of the sale. The court refused confirmation. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Draper v. MedlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Atlantic Loan Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Prisant v. FeingoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Irvin v. SpratlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Johnson v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salter v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Marshall v. MarthinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Gormley v. CleavelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API