Legal Opinion
Haymond v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 15, 1997No. File No. CV970568508SPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, John I. Haymond, is an attorney and member of the bar of the state of Connecticut. See Connecticut Practice Book §§ 18 through 23. The defendant statewide grievance committee (committee) pursuant to § 27G of the Practice Book is authorized to decide complaints of attorney misconduct.
The plaintiff was found by the committee to have violated rules 7.1(a)1 and 8.4(c)2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the use of false and misleading telephone directory advertisements and television commercials. The plaintiff was thus reprimanded by the committee through its decision of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Litigat.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Spencer v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Greystone Community Reinvestment Ass'n v. Berean Capital, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Factory Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Dillon Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.