Legal Opinion

Kalyanaram v. Burck

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided June 8, 2006No. 08-05-00132-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

This is an appeal from a grant of a summary judgment. Appellees moved for both a traditional summary judgment and a no-evidence motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted both motions in favor of Appellees. On appeal, Appellant argues the trial court erred in granting the motions because: (1) Res Ju-dicata does not bar his claim for malicious prosecution; (2) the release agreed to by Appellant does not address the claim for malicious prosecution; (3) the trial court erred when it granted the no-evidence summary judgment as to the claim of duress…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fears v. Texas Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Maldonado v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Advanced Modular Power Systems, Inc. D/B/A A.M.P.S. and Gary McCann v. E-One New York, Inc., Fire Apparatus Specialists and Chris Pedde, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Burgess, Shaun v. Castle Keepers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  5. Complete Solar, Inc.; T.J. Rodgers; And Brian Wuebbels v. Andy Phu, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2026

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API