Bradley v. Byerley
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Memorandum. — Error from Barber district court; C. W. Ellis, judge. Action by C. T. Bradley and others against E. M. Byerley and others. From an order discharging garnishees and taxing attorneys’ fees to plaintiffs they bring the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cole, J. :
On April 25, 1889, Bradley & Metcalf brought an action in the district court of Barber county against the firm of Byerley, Dark & Runyan, and at the same time filed an affidavit in garnishment upon which a summons was issued to James P. Hall, Nannie Runyan, and Andrew Axline, as garnishees. *358The garnishee defendants Axline and Runyan filed their answers, denying generally that they were indebted in any manner to the principal defendants or that they had under their possession or control any property, money or credits belonging to said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morrill v. RaymondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hall v. Kansas City Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Helms v. State Ex Rel. MifflinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Stevenson v. Standard Adding Machine Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- R. T. Davis Mill Co. v. BangsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
- Physicians & Dentists Service Bureau, Inc. v. LeslieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936