Adams v. Eidam
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, in an action to recover $56 paid for defendant at his request, by plaintiff, (an insurance agent,) as premiums on insurance policies.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court. 1
The only question deserving particular consideration is whether the findings of the court are to be deemed as em*54bracing the fact that the defendant accepted the policies of insurance, and thus became liable to pay the premiums. The finding of the court is to'the effect that the policies, which, upon the expiration of a former insurance, the plaintiffs sent to the defendant, were received by him, and retained without objection or offer to return during the whole period of one year, specified in the policies as the period covered by the insurance. While this is not a commendable…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Richmond v. Travelers' InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Merchants' & Bankers' Fire Underwriters v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Sinclair v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Grogan v. Travelers' InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Grogan v. Travelers' InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.