Legal Opinion

Voyles v. Voyles

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 23, 1992No. 92-1148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this civil case, the appellant’s tender of the transcript was denied by our clerk because the order extending the time to file the transcript was not entered within the ninety-day period. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(b).

The trial court signed the order within the ninety-day period, but it was not entered within that period. Rule 4(e) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that a final “order is entered within the meaning of this rule when it is filed with the clerk of the court in which the claim was tried.” (Emphasis supplied.)

We explained in Finley v. State, 281 Ark. 38, 661…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Finley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Sullivan v. WickliffeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Farris v. MERRILL LYNCH BANK & TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. King v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Waddle v. SargentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Waddle v. SargentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API