Legal Opinion

Hartnett Co. v. Poultry Fancier Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1918No. Appeal, No. 87PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 87, Jan. T., 1918, by C. J. Delone, from decree of C. P. York Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 4, in equity, confirming auditor’s report in R. W. Hartnett Co. v. Poultry Fancier Publishing Co. Exceptions to report of Ray P. Sherwood, Esq., auditor appointed to distribute balance of the proceeds of the Poultry Fancier Pub. Co. Before Ross, J. The lower court dismissed the exceptions and confirmed the report of the auditor. C. J. Delone,' the creditor, appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 87, Jan. T., 1918, by C. J. Delone, from decree of C. P. York Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 4, in equity, confirming auditor’s report in R. W. Hartnett Co. v. Poultry Fancier Publishing Co. Exceptions to report of Ray P. Sherwood, Esq., auditor appointed to distribute balance of the proceeds of the Poultry Fancier Pub. Co. Before Ross, J. The lower court dismissed the exceptions and confirmed the report of the auditor. C. J. Delone,' the creditor, appealed. Errors assigned, among others, were in dismissing exceptions to the report of the auditor.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

To sustain this appeal findings of the auditor, confirmed by the court below, would have to be disturbed, *104and, as we have not been convinced that there should be such disturbance, the decree of distribution is affirmed, at appellant’s costs.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harbaugh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Catanach's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Sadtler v. Home Pattern Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930