Legal Opinion
Fausz v. NPAS, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 22, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-cv-00145-CRS-DWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*562Memorandum Opinion
Charles R. Simpson III, Senior Judge
I. Introduction
This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant NPAS, Inc. (“NPAS”) for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), ECF No. 53. Plaintiff Ella Fausz, individually and behalf of a putative class of similarly situated persons, responded, ECF No. 56. NPAS replied, ECF No. 58.
NPAS also moved for a hearing and oral argument on the issues that are raised in its motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 55. Fausz did not object, ECF No. 57. As NPAS’s motions concern the same facts and issues, the Court will…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Evans v. NPAS, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Ngo v. NPAS, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021