Legal Opinion

In Re Amaden

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1942No. 26309. Rule dischargedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The board of managers and the committee on grievances of the Chicago Bar Association, as commissioners of this court under rule 59, have filed a report concerning a complaint initiated by the association’s committee on inquiry, charging Walter D. Amaden and a lawyer referred to throughout the report, by order of the board, as “John Doe” with unprofessional conduct as attorneys and counselors at law. We are at a loss to understand on what theory the lawyer charged jointly with Amaden was given the cloak of secrecy. However, as his real name does not appear in the report we have no choice but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re CaseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re DonaghyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re MitgangIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. In Re LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API