Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 5, 1999No. 04-92-00387-CVPublished

1DissentBill J. Stephens, Justice

(Assigned), dissenting.

I respectfully disagree with my colleague’s treatment of Point of Error Number One, and accordingly I dissent.

The majority opinion believes the real issue to be whether “tag-along” venue is a legitimate method of acquiring venue, citing from Justice Michol O’ConnoR, et al., O’ConnoR’s Texas Rules: Civil Trials 95 (1997):

This (the venue statute) permits a plaintiff to establish venue against a target defendant by first filing suit against a friendly defendant, who then will file a third party action against the target defendant,

and concluding that Polaris Inv. Management…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Polaris Investment Management Corp. v. AbascalTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. USX Corp. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  4. WTFO, INC. v. Braithwaite, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  5. Hardy v. De LeonTexas Supreme Court · 1849

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API