Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1DissentBill J. Stephens, Justice
(Assigned), dissenting.
I respectfully disagree with my colleague’s treatment of Point of Error Number One, and accordingly I dissent.
The majority opinion believes the real issue to be whether “tag-along” venue is a legitimate method of acquiring venue, citing from Justice Michol O’ConnoR, et al., O’ConnoR’s Texas Rules: Civil Trials 95 (1997):
This (the venue statute) permits a plaintiff to establish venue against a target defendant by first filing suit against a friendly defendant, who then will file a third party action against the target defendant,
and concluding that Polaris Inv. Management…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Polaris Investment Management Corp. v. AbascalTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- USX Corp. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
- WTFO, INC. v. Braithwaite, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- Hardy v. De LeonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.