Legal Opinion

People v. Houthoofd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2010No. Docket 138959 and 138969PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHathaway, J.

In this opinion, we address only whether venue was proper in Saginaw County for defendant’s trial on charges of solicitation to commit murder and witness intimidation. We conclude that venue was not proper for either charge because neither crime was committed in Saginaw County. However, because improper venue is not a constitutional structural error, this matter is subject to a harmless error analysis under MCL 769.26. In this case, defendant was not deprived of his due process right to a fair trial before an impartial jury and there has been no miscarriage of justice. Moreover, MCL 600.1645…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. People v. CarinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. AspyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People of Michigan v. Romon Berry McBurrowsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. People v. English; People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Msc 346661 People Of Mi V Kevin White Jr Supremecourtopinion 4/4/2022Michigan Supreme Court · 2022
  5. People of Michigan v. Arthur Larome JemisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API