Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. O'Farrell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1902No. 11,966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from court of appeals, northern department; John H. Mahan, Abijah Wells, and Sam’l W. McElroy, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

Peter O’Farrell, administrator of the estate of Mamie Whitbeck, deceased, sued the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in the district court of Leavenworth county on a life insurance policy issued on the life of Mamie Whitbeck in the sum of $500. The defendant pleaded payment. The plain*279tiff recovered judgment, and the defendant prosecuted error to the court of appeals, where said judgment was affirmed (Insurance Co. v. O’Farrell, 10 Kan. App. 151, 62 Pac. 673), and it now prosecutes error from that judgment to this court.

Under the issues,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. O'FarrellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  2. Sheridan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. American Nat. Ins. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Prudential Insurance v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918
  5. Blanchett, Adm. v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API