Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cravens v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1985No. 366-84Published

1ConcurrenceClinton, Judge

Common to both civil and criminal actions is a general rule that questions as to place of residence, occupation and “background” of a witness may be asked in order to place before the jury facts from which they may judge his standing and weight to be given to his testimony. Williams v. State, 604 S.W.2d 146, 149 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Carrillo v. State, 566 S.W.2d 902, 916 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Elam v. State, 518 S.W.2d 367, 369 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); 37 Tex.Jur.3d 32-33, Evidence § 666. But that rule contemplates that such questions are part of a “preliminary inquiry” directed to a witness called by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Boon v. F. M. Weathered's AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Brittain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API