Legal Opinion
Young v. Equitec Real Estate Investors Fund
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 3, 1995No. 67480PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal was filed, briefed, and argued under our Local R. 25 as an accelerated appeal. The parties in this appeal have agreed to the resolution of the issues under App.R. 11.1(E). Consequently, our decision will be brief and in conclusory form. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 158, 11 OBR 240, 463 N.E.2d 655. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s decision.
The trial court’s decision denied movant-appellant Davison & Company’s motion to intervene in a foreclosure action where Leonard J. Haase was appointed receiver for property owned by Equitec Real Estate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re StaplerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. SchulteOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Classic Properties v. Board of Trustees, Unpublished Decision (1-28-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Holstein v. Crescent Communities, Unpublished Decision (9-9-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.