Legal Opinion
State v. Schulte
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 18, 2003No. C-020673 and C-020674PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} Intervenor/appellant, the city of Cheviot, appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its Civ.R. 24(A) motion to intervene. We affirm.
{¶ 2} A Cheviot police officer seized appellee William C. Schulte’s car under R.C. 4511.195 after arresting Schulte for several traffic violations, including driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1).
{¶ 3} Before trial, the court ordered the vehicle returned to Schulte. But the impoundment lot required Schulte to pay $1,290 in fees before it would release the vehicle. Schulte paid. The operator of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. MeagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Fairview General Hospital v. FletcherOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- D & B Immobilization Corp. v. DuesOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Young v. Equitec Real Estate Investors FundOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Cincinnati Complaint Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HawrylakOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. LamkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. QuinnOhio Court of Appeals · 2024