Howell v. Cook
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Sharon Howell, individually and as the next friend of Robert Shane Rhodes, appeals from a summary judgment for Barry and Carol Cook on Howell's claim of negligence. We affirm.
Viewed most favorably toward Howell, the supporting deposition sets out the following facts: Robert Shane Rhodes (hereinafter "Shane") and a friend of his offered to mow the Cooks' lawn. Carol Cook agreed, and a price was arranged, with the provision that Shane and his friend use their own lawnmowers and gasoline.
Shane was not wearing shoes as he mowed, and had stepped on numerous over-ripe peaches that had fallen from a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Turner v. Systems Fuel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Bogue v. R & M GROCERYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pearson v. Delchamps, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Lindsey by Hodges v. Camelot MusicSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Richards v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Skipper v. Shannon, Strobel & Weaver, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Watkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.