Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Pittsburg & Steubenville R. R.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1885No. Suits No. 3PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Tlie facts of the case appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, President:

This cause No. 3, with Nos. 1 and 2, which were considered and a decree rendered therein on February 22, 1877, were before this Court and the decree affirmed. (18 W. Va. 184.) A statement of the causes may be there found. -On the same day that said decree was rendered the attachments issued in Eos. 1 and 2 were passed upon, and the attached property ordered to- be sold; but the legal title was not before the Court in this cause, (No. 3) and the attachment therein was not passed upon by the court below tor that reason, and this cause was therefore remanded to rules to bring…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Northern Indiana Railroad Co. v. MICHIGAN CENT. RD. CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Watts v. Waddle Ex Rel. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Delaplain v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Altmeyer v. CaulfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Smith v. Parkersburg Co-Operative Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bruff v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Congrove v. BurdettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mitchell v.Amador Canal & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API