Legal Opinion

Crespin v. State of New Mexico

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1998No. 97-2046PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to revisit the appropriate standard to be applied under the federal Confrontation Clause when determining the admissibility of a non-testifying accomplice’s. confession. We conclude that an incorrect standard was applied.

Felix Crespin is a prisoner in New Mexico state custody,- convicted of armed robbery and related charges. He seeks habeas relief, contending that the admission at trial of the custodial confession of a non-testifying co-defendant violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The United States district…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brown v. UphoffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Peterson v. USAA Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
  3. United States v. AldanaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1998
  4. Anderson v. BoxbergerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  5. Atlas Biologicals, Inc. v. KutrubesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API