Legal Opinion

United States v. Aldana

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 17, 1998No. 2:98-cv-00122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant, Paul Aldana, has made a motion to sever his prosecution from that of two other defendants. Aldana has also made a motion in limine to preclude the admission of out of court statements made by a code-fendant to third persons that implicate the defendant.

The defendant' Aldana contends that to admit the eodefendant’s statement would violate Aldaria’s right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment. Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968); Gray v. Maryland, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1151, 140 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. DunneDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API