Legal Opinion
Prentiss & Carlisle Company, Inc. v. Koehring-Waterous Division of Timberjack, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 6, 1992No. 91-2056PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, the District Court for the District of Maine entered judgment against Koehring-Waterous Division of Timberjack, Inc. (“Timberjack”) on a breach of express warranty claim brought by Prentiss and Carlisle Company, Inc. (“Prentiss”). Timberjack appeals, alleging numerous trial errors and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.
I
Prentiss is a forest products company. In February 1989, it purchased a timber harvesting machine that had been manufactured by Timberjack. The machine, known as a fellerbuncher, saws off trees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rosemount, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Virginia T. Gillentine v. Maxwell N. McKeand Lawrence MooreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Raymond v. Raymond Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Raymond Johnson v. H.K. Webster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Brazos River Authority v. GE Ionics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ahern v. ScholzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Poulin v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Aranda v. City of McMinnvilleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Velazquez v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.