Legal Opinion
McClendon v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2007No. ED 87802PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.
Introduction
Donald McClendon (“Movant”) appeals from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm in part and remand in part.
Factual and Procedural Background
On May 30, 2003, officers responded to a call in Florissant, Missouri. The officers were told that someone matching Movant’s description was attempting to steal a car. The officers discovered Movant in a car in which the rear window had been broken, the interior ransacked and the steering column broken in a manner…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Hutchison v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jerry A. Rutlin, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Williams v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009