Legal Opinion

In Re Edens

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 2001No. 25268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts as admitted in the agreement are as follows.

Facts

Respondent represented a client in a real estate closing in 1993. In 1999, the client discovered two mortgage refinance transactions that were executed at closings subsequent to the 1993 purchase of the property. The client had no knowledge of the transactions and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re BeldingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. In re ZennerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API