Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 13, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is called a suit to quiet title. However, the title to all of the land involved herein was determined as between the parties hereto (or their grantors) by a decree entered in accordance with the mandate of this court in Davis v. Stevens,344 Mo. 24, 124 S.W.2d 1132. The prayer of the petition herein seeks a judgment for possession (as well as a determination of the title), which perhaps may have been the real reason for bringing this suit. Defendants' answer sought as affirmative relief an adjudication that the title was in defendant Ethel S. Edwards. The judgment herein made the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Holdoway Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Prasse v. PrasseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Davis v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. WigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. Disalvo Properties, LLC v. Bluff View Commercial, LLC, and Debi PurvisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Edwards Land Timber Company v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. Faris v. City of CaruthersvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. McIntosh v. WigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API