Ney v. Wrenn
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Augusta • county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendants. Pliantiffs assign error.
1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.
Isaac Ney and M. Wurzburger, his partner, were the. owners of a “soft drink plant,” at Harrisonburg, Va., the equipment thereof consisting of machinery, bottles and crates, which machinery had been operated by them for two seasons, 1909 and 1910, and a part of 1911, in the business conducted by them at Harrisonburg, under the style of Harrisonburg Bottling Works. Wurzburger had charge of the operation of the plant and Ney had attended to the office work, bookkeeping and correspondence. Early in 1911 the calls upon Wurzburger for attention to a store conducted by him, also in the town of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bowman v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- Luck Construction Co. v. County of RussellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. McCarthySupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. SpatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- City of Richmond v. McCormackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Price v. FrancisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Sutherland v. WamplerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
- Southern Tire Sales Corp. v. A. M. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924