The State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFadden, Judge.
The state appeals from the trial court’s grant of a general demurrer against an indictment’s count alleging that Tommy Lugene Wright committed the offense of possession of a controlled substance in violation of OCGA § 16-13-30 (a). We affirm, because the indictment does not identify a substance listed as a controlled substance under the statute.
“A general demurrer challenges the sufficiency of the substance of the indictment[.]” Bryant v. State, 320 Ga. App. 838, 841 (3) (740 SE2d 772) (2013) (citation omitted). “An indictment shall be deemed sufficiently technical and correct…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. CorhenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Tibbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Nixdorf v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- State v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Antonio Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Zachariah Micahel Paukan v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023