Legal Opinion

Strickland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 25, 2019No. A18A1829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, Judge.

Antonio Strickland was charged by uniform traffic citation with following too closely in violation of OCGA § 40-6-49. At the close of evidence during his bench trial, Strickland made an oral motion to quash the charge, which the trial court denied. Strickland now appeals his conviction of following too closely, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the charge because the citation fails to allege the essential elements of the offense. For the reasons explained below, we agree and reverse.

1. General or special demurrer. At the outset, we address…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Hogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Cargile v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. State v. WareSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MondorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Brande Erica Lenece Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  3. Cashawn Lemond Barker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
  4. Clayton Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
  5. Jackson Hattaway Stapelton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API