Legal Opinion

Penobscot Chemical Fibre Co. v. Inhabitants of Bradley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 19, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On report. Judgment for appellant. Appeal by plaintiff corporation from assessments of taxes in defendant town for the years 1901 and 1902. After the evidence had been taken out in the Court below, the case was sent to the Law Court on report “for determination upon so much of the evidence as is legally admissible.” The case appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.

Appeal from assessments of taxes in the defendant town for the years 1901 and 1902, brought under Public Laws, 1895, c. 122, § 1, (li-. S., 1903, c. 9, § 79). The property assessed consisted of (1) a mill privilege, including the shore, embracing about eight acres of land, and a small mill used for cutting and splitting poplar wood, (2) about eleven acres of land, upon which was a two story house, and, (3) in the assessment of 1902 only, fourteen lots of land. As to the third class, it is claimed that these fourteen lots are embraced in the general descriptions of land contained in the first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. City of Lowell v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Randell v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kittery Electric Light Co. v. Assessors of KitterySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  2. Alfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  3. Berry v. DaigleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Susquehanna Power Co. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API