Legal Opinion

Susquehanna Power Co. v. State Tax Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 12, 1930No. [No. 38, April Term, 1930.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The Susquehanna River, prior to the construction of the Conowingo dam, flowed in a series of pools and rapids over a rocky bed through a narrow basin or valley from the McCall’s Perry dam in Pennsylvania to Share’s Landing in Maryland, a distance of some fourteen miles. In that distance the fall of the river was about one hundred feet. That fall, the shape of the basin through which the river flows, and the volume of its flow, combined to give to that basin a peculiar value because of its potential utility for the construction of an artificial lake or pool which might be controlled and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. PenistonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Thomson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Brack v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. Browne v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Power Co. v. State Tax Comm'n of Md. (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Weaver v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Meade Heights, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. National Can Corp. v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. State Tax Commission v. GalesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API