Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Hellings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1987No. 4PA87PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

This case comes before us on appeal on two issues: whether the trial judge committed reversible error (1) in his instruction to the jury on contributory negligence and (2) in imposing discovery sanctions on the plaintiff. For the reasons explained below, we reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate and affirm the order of the trial court imposing sanctions.

Lisa Hellings and Melissa Watkins were freshmen roommates at The University of North Carolina at Wilmington. On the night of 9 April 1983, Melissa (plaintiffs decedent) asked Lisa (defendant) to go with her to a nightclub…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Samuels v. BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mullis v. SechrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Evans v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Sessions v. SloaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. K2 Asia Ventures v. TrotaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API