Legal Opinion

Mississippi Bar v. Derivaux

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2014No. 2012-BA-01330-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this attorney-misconduct case, we must decide whether the two-year suspension imposed on an attorney by the Mississippi Bar Complaint Tribunal (“Tribunal”) is sufficient. Finding that the sanction imposed is sufficient, we affirm the Tribunal’s decision.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. Allen Derivaux (“Allen”) was admitted to practice law in 1980. His prac*165tice included mostly title work and loan closings. Prior to 2009, Allen had a title-agency agreement with a title insurance company which allowed him to write and sell title insurance through the company.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re SedilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Reid v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McIntyre v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. The Mississippi Bar v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mississippi Bar v. SweeneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Derivaux v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Derivaux v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API