Derivaux v. Mississippi Bar
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LAMAR, Justice, for the Court:
¶ 1. John Allen Derívame Jr. brings his Petition for Reinstatement before this Court, but the Mississippi Bar argues that Derivaux’s Petition fails to comply with the requirements of Mississippi Rule of Discipline 12(7), as well as Mississippi- caselaw. We agree with the Bar and dismiss Deri-vamos Petition for Reinstatement.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2. On November 18, 2011, a Mississippi Bar Complaint Tribunal disbarred Derí-vame. Miss. Supreme Ct. Cause No. 2010-B-928. After a hearing on Derivaux’s Motion to Reconsider, the Tribunal modified its previous…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re BensonMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Burgin v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re MorrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Reinstatement of HollemanMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re SteeleMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Derivaux v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 2016