In re Richard H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Despite the fact that the term of the appellant’s probation has already expired, there may be collateral consequences result*1006ing from the adjudication of delinquency and, therefore, the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as adjudged , the appellant to be a juvenile delinquent has not been rendered academic (see Matter of Natasha G., 91 AD3d 948 [2012]; Matter of Tafari M., 90 AD3d 1052 [2011]; Matter of Ejiro A., 268 AD2d 428, 428 [2000]).
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court properly adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, since a preponderance of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Tafari M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Natasha G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Brittany C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Ejiro A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Claudia G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.