Legal Opinion
In re Natasha G.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Despite the fact that the term of the appellant’s probation has already expired, there may be collateral consequences resulting from the adjudication of delinquency and, therefore, the appeal has not been rendered academic (see Matter of Tafari M., *94990 AD3d 1052 [2011]; Matter of Isaiah I., 23 AD3d 469 [2005]; Matter of Ejiro A., 268 AD2d 428 [2000]; see also Family Ct Act § 381.2 [2]).
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating her a juvenile delinquent and directing a 12-month period of probation instead of giving her an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Tafari M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Antoine H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Ejiro A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Liston J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Isaiah I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matter of Nigel H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Brian N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Joshua G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of Nijuel J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- In re Antwaine T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.