Legal Opinion
Vidrine v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1962No. 483PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRUGÉ, Judge.
Suit was filed by plaintiff, Wallace Vid-rine, against New Amsterdam Casualty Company, the workmen’s compensation carrier of plaintiff’s employer, Deo Fruge. The plaintiff seeks workmen’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability which resulted from his contracting tuberculosis during the course and scope of his employment. A motion for summary judgment was filed March 30, 1961 by the defendant, on May 9, 1961 the trial court rendered judgment over-ruling the motion for summary judgment. Answer was filed by defendant on June 29, 1961 and a judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Behan v. John B. Honor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Robichaux v. Realty Operators, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hidalgo v. General Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Geist v. Martin Decker Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Gotte v. Cities Service Oil CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Grey v. Avondale Service FoundryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Jarvis v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966