Legal Opinion
Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & Company
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 1, 1959No. 44226PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Daniel Cutno, alleging that he is totally and permanently disabled from the effects of an accident suffered by him on July 18, 1956 in the course of his employment with Neeb Kearney & Company, sued his employer and its insurer to recover workmen’s compensation on that basis under R.S. 23 :- 1021 et seq. The case is now before us on a writ of certiorari granted upon his application to review the judgment of the Orleans Court of Appeal affirming the judgment of the district court dismissing his suit. See Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & Company, La.App., 103 So.2d 494, 499. *
Prior to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
- Jackson v. Travelers' Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Dortch v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hollingsworth v. Crossett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Ceasar v. Crispy Cajun RestaurantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- Authement v. Wal-MartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Finn v. Delta Drilling CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.