Legal Opinion

Wells v. Burroughs

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1933No. 4411PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

In view of the evidence in the case, considered in the most favorable light to the plaintiffs, it cannot be held that there was . error in giving the peremptory instruction to the jury. The issues arising became matters of pure law and not of fact for the jury. (1) The evidence wholly fails to show that any covenant of use or stipulation of defeasance or reverter was omitted from the deed by mistake, accident, or fraud. And the deed having been read to plaintiffs, they could not claim they were ignorant or mistaken as to the contents thereof. Parker v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. SchrimsherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Harper v. Lott Town & Improvement Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Eldora Oil Co. v. ThompsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Shaw Equipment Co. v. Hoople Jordan Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Stone v. TignerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  4. Spain v. FustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Townsend v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF DALLASCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API