Legal Opinion
MacHnik v. Buffalo Pumps Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 17, 2007No. Civil Action 3:07cv357 (CFD)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO REMAND
DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Edward Machnik (“Ma-chnik”) and his wife, Elizabeth Machnik, brought this action against General Electric Co. (“GE”), Viad Corp. (“Viad”), and several other defendants in Connecticut Superior Court on February 7, 2007. Ma-chnik was diagnosed with malignant meso-thelioma in December, 2006. Machnik served as a machinist’s mate in the U.S. Navy from 1949 to 1952, where he worked in the engine room and boiler room of the U.S.S. Vogelgesang. His complaint alleges that he developed mesothelioma because he was exposed to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jefferson County v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- Holdren v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Hilbert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Pantalone v. Aurora Pump Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.