Marchiano v. Mason
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*740Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, our review of the record discloses that the trial court’s charge with respect to the issue of "significant disfigurement” under the "No Fault” law adequately conveyed the applicable legal principles to the jury (see, PJI 2:88B [1991 Supp], see also, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Edwards v DeHaven, 155 AD2d 757; Landsman v Bunker, 142 AD2d 986; Prieston v Massaro, 107 AD2d 742, 743). It is well settled that in order to establish the existence of a significant disfigurement within the meaning of the "No Fault” law, a plaintiff must establish, inter alia, that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prieston v. MassaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Caruso v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Caruso v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Edwards v. DeHavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Siegle v. County of FultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spevak v. SpevakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995