Legal Opinion
Krysa v. Payne
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 2005No. WD 64589PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.
Appellants Emmett and Terri Payne appeal from a judgment entered against them in favor of Respondents Frank and Shelly Krysa on Respondents’ claims of fraudulent nondisclosure and fraudulent misrepresentation arising from Appellants’ sale of a used truck to Respondents. The jury awarded Respondents $18,449.53 in actual damages and $500,000 in punitive damages. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment.
In November 2000, Respondents were shopping for a truck to pull them 28-foot trailer. During the course of their search, they visited Payne’s Car Company, a used…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lillian M. Lewellen, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Chad Franklin and Chad Franklin National Auto Sales North, LLC, Respondents/Cross-Appellants.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Peel v. Credit Acceptance Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Gail & Darrell Mansfield v. Caleb Horner & John HornerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Rotskoff v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.