Legal Opinion

Sendlewski v. Town of Southampton

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 12, 1990No. CV 89-0110PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEXLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Michael and Carol Ann Sendlewski, husband and wife, bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Town of Southampton (the “Town”) and numerous Town officials (collectively, “defendants”) seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief and attorney’s fees. Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay the proceedings in this action pending the resolution of state court actions brought by the Town against plaintiffs. For the reasons below, the motion to dismiss is granted.

I. Background

As alleged in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Township of Lawrence ParkDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Thomas v. VendittoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Homere v. Inc. Vill. of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  4. Saunders v. FlanaganDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
  5. Wandyful Stadium, Inc. v. Town of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API