Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Waterbury Brass Goods Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 9, 1925No. 111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

The action is brought on a written instrument of guaranty whereby the defendant guaranteed to the plaintiff the punctual payment by the Electric Case Company, Inc., for all goods, not exceeding $25,000, sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the Electric Case Company, and further guaranteed the full performance by the latter of all and any contracts entered into between the plaintiff and the latter company. The written guaranty was dated December 29,1919.

The plaintiff alleged in its complaint that thereafter, and on the faith of the guaranty, it entered into certain…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United States v. SpeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Page v. . KrekeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cole v. Loma Plastics Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1953
  2. Hodes v. Hoffman International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Shaffer v. Great American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  4. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Chatz v. Armour Plant Employees' Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API