Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Eng

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 24, 1993No. 4:CV92-3268PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*637MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Assigned to me by the trial judge are the pending motions for sanctions filed by various defendants in this action. (Filings 5, 7, 9, 42 and 46). For reasons stated more fully below, I shall grant the motions.

I. Background

Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action on July 29, 1992 (filing 1). The original complaint suffered from a number of deficiencies. Specifically, the allegations of the complaint were so disjointed and obscure that the complaint failed to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Moreover,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Burgs v. SisselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Vaquillas Ranch Co. v. Texaco Exploration & ProductionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  2. Giganti v. Gen-X Strategies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
  3. Knutson v. AG Processing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  4. Rubin v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Sebring Homes Corp. v. T.R. Arnold & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API